![]() ![]() The order's name is in honor of Hubert, the patron saint of hunters and fishermen.Ĭibolo Creek Ranch owner John Poindexter and C. Some hold titles, such as grand master, prior and knight grand officer. You should be a member too.Members of the worldwide, male-only society wear dark green robes emblazoned with a large cross and the motto Deum Diligite Animalia Diligentes, which means "Honoring God by honoring His creatures," according to the group's website. Sign up here!Ĭheck out Liberty Classroom, a site that teaches economics and history from a liberty perspective. Join the Constitutional Vanguard! We're a group devoted to promoting the principles of the Constitution, liberty, and the free market. Make the comments of annoying commenters disappear, with a simple comment script! Instructions here: We are a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for us to earn fees by linking to and affiliated sites. Similarly, Howard Wolfson, a former top aide to Hillary Clinton and former New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg, said Ginsburg shouldn’t have said it. ![]() However tempted she might be, she shouldn’t be doing it.” “I find it baffling actually that she says these things,” said Arthur Hellman, a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh. Ginsburg is known for pushing the bounds of a justice’s public comments and has earned something of a cult following on the left. And in saying it, she goes to a place justices almost never do - and perhaps never have - for some very good reasons. This appears to be a joke, but Ginsburg’s sentiment here is crystal clear: She thinks Donald Trump would be a dangerous president. Ginsburg also recalled something her late husband said about such matters: “Now it’s time for us to move to New Zealand.” For the court, it could be - I don’t even want to contemplate that.” “For the country, it could be four years. “I can’t imagine what this place would be - I can’t imagine what the country would be - with Donald Trump as our president,” Ginsburg told the Times’ Adam Liptak. Ginsberg is not #NeverTrump, she is #NeverGOP Leftmost column only, below the fold) Sammy Finkelman (c82029). It does say near the bottom of the web page:Ī version of this article appears in print on July 11, 2016, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: Ginsburg Has a Few Words About Trump. “I thought Heller was…adding that a chance to reconsider it could arise whenever the court considers a challenge to a gun control law are missing from the printed paper. The words: “…may be another matter, she said. “I thought Heller was “a very bad decision,” she said, adding that a chance to reconsider it could arise whenever the court considers a challenge to a gun control law.īut not all of that is in the printed paper. Heller, establishing an individual right to own guns, may be another matter, she said. The court’s 2008 decision in District of Columbia v. ![]() She said she did not see how that could be done. Holder, which effectively struck down a key part of the Voting Rights Act. She mulled whether the court could revisit its 2013 decision in Shelby County v. It’s online (and will be seen whenever anyone looks up the article online:) But if it would further their political agenda, they might like you better dead.ģ5. “Think what would have happened” if my friend had remained alive.īeware befriending a radical leftist. Obama and the immigrants he had tried to protect. Instead of a single sentence announcing the tie, she suggested, a five-justice majority would have issued a precedent-setting decision dealing a lasting setback to Mr. “Think what would have happened had Justice Scalia remained with us,” she said. That was unfortunate, Justice Ginsburg said, but it could have been worse. Obama’s plan to spare more than four million unauthorized immigrants from deportation and allow them to work. Texas, left in place a nationwide injunction blocking Mr. When the case was argued in January, the majority seemed prepared to overrule a 1977 precedent that allowed public unions to charge nonmembers fees to pay for collective bargaining.Ī second deadlock, in United States v. ![]() “This court couldn’t have done better than it did,” Justice Ginsburg said of the deadlock. California Teachers Association, averted what would have been a severe blow to public unions had Justice Scalia participated. But this New York Times interview suggests. Justice Scalia and Justice Ginsburg were friends, we were told. You think I’m exaggerating with that headline? I wish I were. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |